• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This doesn’t apply to the example

    If it doesn’t apply, then can’t you just let us have the meme and move on? Is it that important that you have to well actually us on a stupid meme?

    • slothrop@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago
      1. Upload a Political Cartoon to Political Humor.
      2. Title it ‘Semantic is Pedantic’.
      3. Wait for comments.
      4. Self-fulfilling IRONY!
      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        The thing is that “double negative bad” is a pedantic talking point. Sorry for making you aware of that.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m at a loss as to where in the meme it suggests that double negatives are bad?

          What I see is someone demonstrating to someone else on how to convert a specific double negative into its simplest and most direct form.

          • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m sure this will be interpreted as being pedantic on my side but either way: It’s a pedantic talking point that double negatives cancel each other out. “I don’t see nobody” would mean that I see someone. This is empirical and demonstrably false. Since the head line is “double negatives”, it is heavily implied that the logic on the board applies to all double negatives which is wrong. Of cause you could construct a scenario where the teacher will show other examples where the negative doesn’t cancel each other out but the negation is expressed in multiple ways. This is a very unlikely reading

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Honestly, some things don’t require as much thought as you’re putting into this. That’s the beautiful (and yes, confusing/conflicting) thing about language: it’s flexible when you need it to be.

              In the meantime, just enjoy the meme! 😊

    • jaselle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      personally, I think it’s always fair game to “well actually” something which itself has “well actually” energy.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the more important criticism is really that they don’t care if they’re fascist anyway