• Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is why they have this stupid math on the packaging.

      Because if all you look at is price / meter the lowest quality is obviously going to be the cheapest.

      If you get 2-ply or 3-ply, it’s 2-3 more sheets per meter and much softer. So more expensive per meter, but you can also use less since you can use 4 sheets instead of 8 and get the same softness/padding.

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    The one that lists sheets is at least using a verifiable metric. It’s better than the “right rolls of unspecified size are more than 39 different rolls of unspecified size”.

    Still silly because no one knows how many sheets they use before changing the roll, but at least it’s reasonable silly.

  • Pat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is such bullshit. Pointless manipulation of product offerings to hide the true cost, and thereby manipulate prices. I’ve been doing paper towel math like this for years and it drives me nuts. Grocery stores’ profit model is now almost entirely based on price manipulation and nothing else.

  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    yknow what’s great? unit pricing laws

    tldr: in australia businesses must display “unit price” on labels: price per 100g, per 100ml, per sheet, etc for every product so that packages are comparable

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        ditto! i’d probably do it in my head for a lot of things still because metric is easy, but it saves me so much time and i’m sure i’m an outlier

    • falseWhite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The thing with toilet rolls though, is they show price per roll, but the rolls themselves have different amounts of sheets. So you gotta do the extra math.

      Unless in your country they show price per sheet? Which I would assume would be below one cent.

    • Fergie434@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s some brands that cheat this in Australia.

      They have “select a size” or something, where they have smaller length sheets. So you get a bigger number of them and it shows a lower price/100 sheets.

      Only ever seen the small length ones on the shelves, but I haven’t looked that hard though tbh.

    • Denvil@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      We have this in the US for most things too, at least in Ohio where I’m from, not sure about other states or if it’s a federal thing. I’m not an expert on the law of it, but I can’t think off the top of my head anything that doesn’t have it.

      I believe paper towels and TP are $ per square foot or smth like that

      • dion_starfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Square foot isn’t a great estimate for toilet paper, because within certain limits no one cares about the width of their TP. This means manufacturers will enshittify their products by making the rolls slightly wider (but fewer sheets). The packaging makes it seem like they’re selling the same amount, but you suddenly find yourself needing to buy more.

        • Denvil@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s better than having no measurement at all. I agree it’d be better to rate it with a measurement actually relevant to its use, but the main thing is at least we have it and thusly can improve it if we pressure whoever regulates it enough.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    Toilet paper making is an ART! No other industry manages to create a half-ply so transparent that you can read your newspaper through it, while still delivering the tactile experience of an 80 grid industrial sandpaper.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Brother, just spend the few extra bucks and buy name brand, the extra money ain’t gonna kill ya. Meanwhile, the TP you seem to buy now might have you bleeding to death from your ass.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s not my toilet paper, but one I recently had to endure on a non-private toilet. I was just amazed that they can actually produce such a paper. I’m quite attached to my ass and it’s wellbeing, so sure I buy the better stuff for me and my family.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/magazine/why-do-americans-stink-at-math.html

    One of the most vivid arithmetic failings displayed by Americans occurred in the early 1980s, when the A&W restaurant chain released a new hamburger to rival the McDonald’s Quarter Pounder. With a third-pound of beef, the A&W burger had more meat than the Quarter Pounder; in taste tests, customers preferred A&W’s burger. And it was less expensive. A lavish A&W television and radio marketing campaign cited these benefits. Yet instead of leaping at the great value, customers snubbed it.

    Only when the company held customer focus groups did it become clear why. The Third Pounder presented the American public with a test in fractions. And we failed. Misunderstanding the value of one-third, customers believed they were being overcharged. Why, they asked the researchers, should they pay the same amount for a third of a pound of meat as they did for a quarter-pound of meat at McDonald’s. The “4” in “¼,” larger than the “3” in “⅓,” led them astray.

    America: Failing 2nd grade math since the 1980s.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      In fairness, the people they surveyed grew up breathing lead. I wonder if a modern audience would handle that test better

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I would think worse actually, fairly sure our literacy and numeracy scores are worse now than in the 80s.

          Ah, ok, they peaked in 2012, been declining since, almost back down to 70s/80s levels.

          This graoh only goes to 2022… and other sources have those scores continuing to fall.

          And we also have TikTok destroying everyone’s attention spans and capacity to self regulate today.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        The modern consumer would understand the a&w restaurant is probably run much more city than the McDonald’s restaurant unfortunately. It’s always interesting to me when I go to the McDonald’s near my house that shares a parking lot with KFC / a&w and unfortunately that a&w and KFC restaurant is literally one of the worst run restaurants in my area. Only rivaled by the Wendy’s three blocks away. Where is that McDonald’s the worst they’ve done is late night they’re shake machine and ice cream machine always seems to be broken and they get my order wrong probably one out of every five times. But not blatantly wrong every single order.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          The modern consumer would understand the a&w restaurant is probably run much more city than the McDonald’s restaurant unfortunately.

          … What does ‘run much more city’ mean?

          Were you trying to type ‘shittily’?

          • titanicx@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah I was supposed to be shitty but when you do voice to text and don’t look at what’s typed out it kind of messes up sometimes not a big deal you got the idea

    • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      No one goes to A&W for their burgers, especially in the 80’s. Hot dogs and root beer.

  • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 days ago

    I just look at the area of paper on the bottom. That’s what it boils down to, right? Using standard rolls as some benchmark is meaningless.

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    All this effort to communicate the idea of bigger or smaller rolls instead of just giving us the total surface area. But then, this isn’t about informing the consumer it’s about making it seem bigger. If they just gave us a total measurement in sq ft that would make it too easy to compare prices.

    It’s like guys measuring their dick, they aren’t terribly concerned with the validity of the measurement as long as the result sounds good.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Given the information here, I believe that:

    1 Giant Roll = 2.25+ Rolls = 2250+ Sheets

    1 Double Roll = 2 Rolls = 2000 Sheets

    1 Super Mega Roll = 6 Rolls = 6000 Sheets

    1000 Sheets = 1 Roll = 0.5 Double Roll = 0.444 Giant Roll = 0.166 Super Mega Roll

    1 Super Mega Roll = 2.666 Giant Roll = 3 Double Roll = 6 Roll = 6000 Sheets

      • cdf12345@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes , if you use exactly 1 square each time.

        But someone so enterprising and smart like you probably uses both sides, so 12,000 shits per roll is on the table.

            • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Get a load of this guy, never used a bidet! /s

              But seriously, there’s many ways to go about it. Some people don’t use anything, some use tp, some bidets blow air, some use a dedicated towel.

              • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                I’ve used a basic add-on version for a toilet, and I actually wiped first, but it evened out, because I didn’t want to get every last particle, just remove the bulk, because I was paranoid about sending bits flying. Of course it also depends on the, uh, consistency.

          • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I used to run a bidet system, but then I found out about xylospongium:

            It’s got slightly different architecture than bidet, and you have to manually compile some of the features that bidetinstall handles automatically, but you gain so much more control over your system. Never going back.

  • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Use a bidet. A single roll lasts me several months. It’s mostly for spot checks on days where I’ve had especially greasy meals.

  • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    Go by weight. If you have two bundles that have the same number of rolls, the heavier one either has more or thicker squares.

  • MissingGhost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    I wish they sold them by shits instead of by sheets. “This package is good for 100 regular shits or 50 creamy shits.”

    • mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      This would be incredibly unreliable. I’d rather want the hard facts: how many sheets per roll and how many plies

      • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Welcome to our newest technology, mini sheets! They are much softer and better for your anal health. Good luck guessing what size they are.