If I write “Terraria APK” in my torrent program’s search window, I get several results.

The problem is that the writers are normal humans.

Imagine this: let’s say the writers themselves do understand the highest level of competence. They write the Voyager crew in a way so that they handle all issues perfectly. How would it be possible for them to come up with any situation where this Voyager crew is challenged? - they can’t. Because they are portraying them as perfectly competent, which is based in the writer’s imagination, the definition of this perfect competency is that the writers could not come up with a way for them to be challenged.

Hence, when making any story like this, it is absolutely essential that the writers leave a flaw that the writers know about. Otherwise they literally would be unable to come up with any challenges. So the characters in Voyager necessarily need to be less competent than the writers.

But since the writers are average humans, the characters necessarily end up being less competent than average.

Maybe you didn’t see it before because TNG and DS9 actually taught you things (i.e. the writers were more competent than you), but those shows were the same. Most issues in those shows are ridiculously badly handled. Some episodes of course are better or worse in this, but that’s just the nature of having to come up with a lot of episode ideas.

The thing is, it’s not actually that important that the characters are competent in actuality. This is where your suspension of disbelief comes in. You just have to believe for the context of the show that the characters are actually super competent. The story is mostly still valid and focuses on human growth and interpersonal relationships, which would be pretty much the same if the situations portrayed would actually be handled better. Even though the characters are not actually competent, you can act as if they are and then everything works again.

No, am neurodivergent man. Rest is true though.

Yeah exactly. My original statement was that it was weird that the article is phrased as if humans were inferior.

Do you really think your parents created the entirety of what constitutes “you”?

It’s not logically equivalent at all, a child learns on its own without parents, or through all kinds of other influences. In addition, if your parents actually knew how to make a human, they would be able to exactly replicate a previous human they created. But this is absolutely impossible, even with genetic clones, as no human actually has any idea how to get another human to be exactly the same as another.

In contrast, someone (or a collection of humans) understands completely how the best Go engine works. They can perfectly replicate the current Go engine by writing the same code again. The Go engine is a product solely by the human mind and, if the code were lost, can be remade by applying the same principles.

“Creating a human” is nothing any human has ever done. Humans have been created by million of years of evolution. In this context, if you want logical equivalency, “nature/universal laws” (or if you’re so inclined, “god”) would be the equivalent representation of what humans are to a Go engine.

So weird that they wouldn’t include the full name :D

Yeah exactly, it’s so weird that the article phrases it like that. I don’t understand why I got so many downvotes :D

Huh, which logic? I’m genuinely confused. I’m just saying that it’s weird that the article is phrasing it like humans are inferior to the Go engine when it’s literally humans who created the Go engine. Just because humans lose to a machine doesn’t make humans inferior, which the article insinuates.

Yes? Why are you saying this to me?

Humans invented and made the AI, so idk why this article is phrased as if humans are inferior :D

Poor Alfredo, noone asked him if he wanted to be emulsified :(

I prefer its smaller and even more inconvenient brother, Antimatter-catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion!

There are roughly 3 trillion trees on earth. Even if they don’t replenish, at 1000/day you need roughly 8 million years to run out.

If you need 1000 trees per day, and you plant 1000 new trees per day, guess when you run out?

By making this post and/or commenting on it with support, does that make you a hypocrite? ;) :D

Oh these 2000 people own 2000 completely unrelated companies! They all make business with each other because the market is so healthy! All the houses are offered at the same prices because the market works so perfectly by forcing companies to compete with each other so the real value is reached!

In none of your stories anything really happened, though. Of course, it might have, but it might also just been coincidence or whatever.

So much is getting better, social media and negativity bias in general is just making it seem like it’s not.

Just for example, percentage of green energy is steadily rising. Even if it is not fast enough, that is still a constant improvement.

Well that’s what you think, he’s actually just been in hiding in a cave in northern Kazakhstan to escape all that public attention. And now he’s on Lemmy because he did actually get a little lonely.

My mind is a funny place.

But it turns out you are actually Andre the Giant, so you can throw them very far and thus trust them a lot.