• 5 Posts
  • 70 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 17th, 2025

help-circle


  • I’m also curious about this. If there are any transparency reports, I’d love to read through that.

    The Wikimedia Foundation are trying to implement some AI solutions (for helping humans, not write articles/information), which is likely quite costly, unless someone donates it. However, I imagine many others’ scrapers for AI are constantly demanding a lot from the Wikipedia servers since some years ago, probably resulting in increased costs. Hopefully the AI builders use a local copy of the torrent instead, but I fear they don’t…

    I’m still happily donating though, as I think the Wikipedia Foundation are still doing a solid job, despite me not always agreeing with their decisions.


  • [Defense Department] information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified

    This is ambiguous, and can be applied to any and all information acquired through the Defense Department.

    Officials indicated the move was needed because any unauthorized disclosure “poses a security risk that could damage the national security of the United States and place [Defense Department] personnel in jeopardy.

    Isn’t this exactly what constitutes the need for information to be classified?

    So ultimately, what is the purpose of letting journalists in at all? To give a false sense of transparency?






  • I’ll try and answer seriously, with some non-exclusive options, in no particular order:

    • Feeling ashamed, mostly because they’re realizing they’re either wrong or sounding stupid.
    • Not wanting controversial stuff related to them to be “saved” for others to find and use for scrutiny.
    • Honest mistakes (wrong community, thread, etc.)
    • The post becomes a cesspool in the comments.
    • Other personal reasons (feeling threatened, wanting a clean inbox, question got answered and they don’t care about historic purposes, etc.)

    These are just my guesses though, and I try and not delete anything personally. I’m aware that anything I put on the internet will be immortalized, and that the healthiest thing I can do is own both my mistakes and my opinions, even if I’m convinced of my stupidity or ignorance at a later time. I’m only a human after all, and doomed to talk before I think. Best I can do is to learn as much as possible from it, and hope that others can also learn from my actions.





  • You seem to look at it quite pessimistically imho, but I’ll try and counter ;-)

    developers won’t support a third platform

    We’re not talking about a vastly different ecosystem. Probably Android-derived (which is open-source), very likely Linux derived. So compatibility is not going to be a huge issue, hence developing not hard. Developers will usually follow where user demand goes, not the other way around.

    nor will customers move to a platform that doesn’t have the big apps that they need

    Most of the big apps today have a smaller equivalent, check AlternativeTo.net.

    Doubling your market share is easy when your market share is so low.

    Generally true, but we’re talking a growth of millions of users a year. Millions of people is no small number. 5% of the US’ traffic are from Linux desktops, according to StatCounter (here’s an article with many links).

    Nope, not in the tens of millions

    You’re correct wrt. gaming, as 2.89% of 157 million active monthly users is about 4.55 million, which is not a small number either.  If you look at Linux desktop users in the US however, we’re talking over 5% of 347 million, which is 17.35 million users in the US alone, which is also not a small number. It’s more than the population of Greece and Bulgaria combined.

    Purely because of the steam deck (wrt. Steam Linux users growth)

    Do you have numbers? I can’t find any official numbers of active users on the Steam Deck, but there are estimations of 3+ million devices sold. I feel like I keep seeing posts of people who move over to Bazzite and similar distros these days for the sake of playing games, but nevertheless, both of these factors weigh in, and are steadily increasing the adaptation of Linux systems.

    without [kernel level anti-cheat] it will never take off because the overwhelmingly most played games all have kernel level anti-cheat.

    This is denying the antecedent. The amount of games, and money in games, without KLAC is plenty substantial to make a difference in the approach of both developers and DRMs, further increasing ease of adaptation by users. Do not undermine nor underestimate the potential of marginalities.




  • Availability in the US might be a bit of a challenge, as the Google/Apple duopoly has solidified greatly over the years there. Europe has the entire BoycottUS movement these days, so there are a lot of attempts at developing something independent there. But as with most new solutions, they have the added difficulty of being compared to these bigger companies who’ve already had many years to develop and perfect their solutions.
    The choice boils down to how much you value your principles over comforts, and whether downgrading to physical cards is worth it. Personally I’ve recently done just that.

    In regards to Android clones becoming worse, I saw GrapheneOS say on Mastodon that it won’t affect them in any significant way. Hopefully this is the case for most, and will remain the case.








  • I think you’re right on all these points, though it depends a bit on what part of the Fediverse you’re exposed to.

    On the point of anti-capitalism, I agree, but (again, depending on the part of the Fediverse) there’s also an incredibly high amount of open-minded people here, compared to other more mainstream social media (like Reddit). I speak much from my perspective of being from lemmy.zip, which I’m impressed by the healthiness of the community since I joined. But there are also less “healthy” instances like lemmy.ml which is considered by many to be infested with tankies (anti-capitalism?).

    And yes, the average age seems to be around mid-30s to me, based solely on how people speak and what they reminisce about.