No. Not enough, not close, deep, or consistent enough.

History and research shows the opposite to be true. Coalition, talking, taking over their topics, anything legitimizing strengthens them. The only effective counter is a broad rejection across politics, society, including companies, religious institutions etc, and press.

Is this with accepting all their terms and functionality, or also when declining?

Does it help you in acceptance or in not doing it?

Two minute rule. If you can do it in two minutes, just do it.

deleted by creator

The European court of auditors (ECA) said the EU was much better prepared than before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine of 2022, but achieving its goal of defence readiness by the end of the decade would be difficult.

I’m sure if it became more pressing and necessary, some things would change much more rapidly, just like decoupling from Russia and increased defense spending did.

What is “defense readiness”?

the European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said “readiness 2030” meant “to have rearmed and developed the capabilities to have credible deterrence” and “an industrial base that is a strategic advantage”.

I don’t know. The EU seems plenty deterrent already, certainly to invade, but also economic strength. Could more strength deter someone like Putin? I don’t know, who doesn’t go by reason? Seems like a pretty diffuse definition and goal to call doubt on “the goal” or “readiness”.

Maybe the negative framing is necessary to pressure for an effective military that would be better able to defend and act? What does “defend” mean? There would certainly be damage no matter the strength.

Die BIP-Prognose wurde hochkorrigiert. Vielleicht müssen wir die Autoindustrie doch nicht unterstützen?

Do you consider Lemmy not to be social media? I guess that’s the for the most part, rather than time used?

In der Schule, im Fach Medienkompetenz.

How much of a car cost is electricity cost vs labor cost? I suspect the latter to me much higher.

The energy economics are more complex than just supply and demand. Pricing has additional conditions.

Is that only about absolute numbers? That says nothing about relative compared to coal if coal also increases.

The second link shows nuclear from 60 to target 110, coal from 1.2k to unknown, wind and solar target 1.2k GW but already at 1.8k.

I don’t see nuclear replacing coal. I see renewables already massively winning.

EDF remains heavily in debt.

France is also importing from Germany when they can’t cover their own demand.

It’s a collaborative network.

In 30 years if you start now, and for how many billions?

And then you gotta turn them off in summer when rivers are too hot or too low.

Their aspiration is to rule over all of America.

On what basis did you proclaim “No! Not legal!” if you’re now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license?

What’s the fine print?

Currently, Putin could use a NATO response, depending on what it is, as justification for mobilization and continuing his war. Probing NATO is not only about disrupting NATO.

You can see in Ukraine how they use terror to break Ukraine, not realizing it makes them more committed and united. The same flaw is in their theory and approach towards European nations. They hope sabotage and terror will push insecurity and fear, disagreement and reduction of support.

This airport is apparently a significant military or Ukraine support hub. So there is a pretty direct benefit too, as well as hope of criticism of support to Ukraine, because of security or economic risk.

An attack on drone production that sends to Ukraine would fulfill multiple goals in their eyes. A retaliation could give justification for mobilization and continuation.

Personally, even in the event of a direct attack with soldiers on land, I expect NATO and EU will act decisive but careful. Not necessarily with retaliation, only with defense. They’re driven by policy and reason. Unlike Russia.

Which, despite plenty of evidence and indication, continues the same strategy at great loss, cannibalizing and destroying itself. Even the “elite” corruption gains, which are still a thing, becomes increasingly volatile and at risk.