I’m mostly half-serious.

  • 269 Posts
  • 504 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • balderdash@lemmy.ziptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldPumped Up Kicks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    My fellow worker: YOU need to buy a gun and legally protest with it. The fact that pro-gun Republicans are a lost cause doesn’t imply armed resistance is a lost cause.

    Part of the reason that Donnie can send ICE into blue cities is because many of us are unarmed. Imagine what would happen if we took lessons from the Black Panther Party and patrolled our streets with armed neighborhood watches.



  • A lot of small dogs try to warn their owners of how they’re feeling. But because they’re small, and because people don’t know how to read dog language, the warning signs are ignored. So the dog has to escalate in order to get their point across.

    Once you begin to learn how dogs communicate you realize that most owners are misinterpreting their dog’s behavior.



  • If you scroll down there is a graph showing an increase of 760 million dollars. Here’s the graph for your convenience:

    Note that the ICE budget is now over 9 billions dollars. (Even before Trump’s massive increase in 2025.) Inflation in 2023 was 4%. An increase to keep up with inflation would be about half of the increase that we see from 2023 to 2024.

    The point is that there is no one to vote for that will abolish ICE because both parties agree that it should continue. And there are many such examples of bi-partisan agreement that supports the wealthy, fascism, or both. I’d be happy to list them for you if you’d like more concrete examples.











  • balderdash@lemmy.ziptoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldAll Ready, already???
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    You’re making two points here that I’d like to distinguish: 1) Difficulty, 2) Progression. The two points are connected, and I can see how your lived experience is relevant here.

    As regards difficulty (#1), this has always been true for every conflict with the state, even for mere civil disobedience. No one wants to face dogs, or fire hoses, or firing squads, or artillery shells. Most people just want to take care of their family (myself included!). But the fact that resistance will not be easy does not make it any less necessary. The ruling class’ quest for infinite profits, which started with imperialism (of land, labor, and resources) abroad, has been steadily coming for the workers at home. Every administration we see the powers of the president growing, every decade it is harder for workers to get by. Now the situation is so dire that the rulers are no longer attempting to hide their disdain for the Constitution and international law. (We are openly throwing brown people in the backs of vans and kidnapping foreign leaders.) If we do not resist, the rulers will consolidate their power under a fascist regime.

    Progression (#2) brings up a practical question concerning time frame. And here I concede your point that the difficulty of resistance requires groundwork. (This is why veterans are so helpful to the groups that are now making preparations.) Note, however, that we do not have the luxury of time. The ruling class is watching how we react and is working against us. The people must be willing to escalate in favor of their demands and must do so quickly. If we are not willing to escalate, then peaceful protests will continue to be ignored (e.g., The Woman’s March); If the people do not escalate quickly enough, then we will either lose steam (e.g., Roe v. Wade protests), be co-opted by the establishment (e.g., Occupy Wallstreet), or be violently suppressed (e.g., BLM).

    There are historical examples showing how swift regime change is possible, but this comment is long enough as is.


  • balderdash@lemmy.ziptoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldAll Ready, already???
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I don’t mean to reduce collective action to open revolt; rather, the former is insufficient. Historically, unions, strikes, civil disobedience, and violence were all employed in order to win concessions from the ruling class. Civil rights and workers rights were won in blood. But these concession were clearly temporary because we are not addressing the root of the problem.

    armed conflict could needlessly get innocents killed.

    The perpetual violence of the state–both domestically (e.g., against protestors) and abroad (e.g., Venezuela, Palestine) – and the violence of our institutions (e.g. healthcare, prisons) already result in countless preventable deaths. Innocents are quietly dying every day and will continue to do so until we address the problem.


  • balderdash@lemmy.ziptoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldAll Ready, already???
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Ironically, logistical questions become much easier to answer if We the People are willing to rebel instead of merely protest.

    Revolutions are essentially all or nothing; anyone who picks up weapons should be prepared to appropriate the food, clothing, housing, medicine, etc. needed to keep it going. Essential goods and services can then be distributed by the revolutionaries themselves (e.g., food/clothing drives, car pools, communal daycare, skills training, weapon’s training, etc). Not only does this mutual aid allow us to fulfill our own needs: it allows us to build solid networks of trust. Lastly, the revolutionaries must stay on the offensive to keep the state on the back foot. The moment they are put on the defensive, the state will capitalize on its overwhelming advantages (organizational, logistical, informational) and the revolutionaries will be ruined.