They’re the main way of taking astronauts to the ISS.

I thought they had announced they were no longer arresting after the courts had called the home office rules into question.

What changed?

“I’m stuck step-bro” isn’t incest. They aren’t related by blood at all. That’s one of the reasons it’s a popular backstory.

Ofcom have a report stating exactly that. The OSA doesn’t work

I think it’s that they think “This is an easy vote winner. Nobody will object to this”.

Yes, I’ll object. You’re wasting your time and my money with this pointless paternalistic crap.

They are a terrifying vector for disinformation - one that only the rich and powerful can create. People generally don’t understand that LLMs 1) will lie to them, and 2) can be tuned to spread any message the owner of the model wants.

Amazing how past player of the game want to change the rules only when it suits them. I’m all in favour, but FPTP was just as shit when it put Major in Power as it is today.

Yep, Bob is making a killing selling them out of his truck.

Probably the pay-wall.

I’m always getting powers of ten wrong.

Regardless 500 workers Vs one CFO?

That would include the CFO too, right?

Alternative viewpoint. You could have retained 5,000 employees.

The spending on space exploration isn’t what is stopping us on satisfying the basic needs of everyone. It’s political will that stops us there. It’s the fact that our governments do not see their populations as their priority. They see their corporations as their priority.

Fine I’ll call my horse meat pie “lentil stew”. Then when the customers are angry I’ll say “I enjoy it being wrong”.

To which the answer is “Human”.

Campaigning on a negative is a ballsy move. She didn’t campaign on “progress” or “forward”. She did it on “not backwards”

If you just give up on a third of the country, then the country will never heal from this. Like it or not, there has to be forgiveness for those who admit they were wrong. Otherwise this never ends and the USA is over.

Of course they’d still have answer questions under oath if subpoenaed. And you would only subpoena the person who held the office at the time of interest. No point in talking to their successor who would know nothing.

I don’t really care. If he can help lead people back from crazy land, I’m all for it.

Can somebody explain peertube for me? It sounds like it should be a federated video service, but either the federation doesn’t work very well or there’s nothing on it.