• KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    They dangle the carrot of “home ownership” as if anyone ever owns a home that can be taken away for not paying taxes.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t think taxes negate ownership.

      If you rent you need permission for every modification, every pet, even for something like planting a garden.

      Ownership can be conditional; you can own a domain, but if you don’t pay the renewal fee it can be taken away; you can own a car, but if you drive it without paying your registration it can be impounded; you can own a business, but if you don’t pay your license renewal it can be revoked.

      Owning something doesn’t mean it can never be taken away or that you don’t need to do anything to keep it.

      • DigitalDruid@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        your interpretation of the concept of ownership practically renders the word meaningless.

        to most people it does in fact mean that it can’t normally be taken away, even though such a thing might be physically or legally possible.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    i mean, this is less of a property tax issue and more of a social security thing.

    Though i am pretty fundamentally against property tax, it’s a physical thing that i can own, i don’t see why i should pay taxes on it. If you want to tax me just hit me with income tax.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        except for the fact that it’s a wealth tax on wealth that’s not really consequential. An income tax by definition must tax ALL income earned by an individual, you cannot hide from that, it’s definitionally, evasion.

        • m0darn@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          How is real estate wealth not consequential?Real estate wealth is real wealth, it’s why it’s literally in the name.

          Personal income tax is not a wealth tax, and there are myriad ways to avoid it without evading it.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            it’s pretty fundamental, there is only a fixed amount of land that exists in the country. A billionaire has roughly 1 billion more dollars than i do. I have roughly one billion dollars less than them, they, weirdly enough, don’t have one billion more times land than me.

            Theoretically they should have “1 billion times more property tax” than i do, but i’m going to imagine that’s not even possible under current tax law.

            Personal income tax is not a wealth tax, and there are myriad ways to avoid it without evading it.

            yeah, because then it’s not income.