Web developer. Lead developer of PieFed

  • 332 Posts
  • 1.84K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2024

help-circle


  • Yep.

    It’s pretty awkward because of the issues OP raised but it was a quick and easy way to get something working with minimal breakage that would be fine 90% of the time. Sometimes that’s good enough for a first attempt.

    As a small project with minimal influence, building something that only works with other PieFed instances kinda dooms that something to irrelevance. If Lemmy ever adds proper vote-independent emoji reactions PieFed would switch to that method immediately.




  • Rimu@piefed.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.mlPieFedeology - Ideological Purity in PieFed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is a strong and succinct argument, cheers.

    We need peoplesdispatch.org I think it’s valuable thing to have a take on events from their angle. Yet it needs to be read with an understanding that they have an angle. Using the warning icon to provide that understanding is clunky and wasn’t really intended for that purpose. There has been some drift in the usage away from the original idea behind the feature.

    One day it might be good to have a different icon for providing context, separate from providing warnings.


  • Rimu@piefed.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.mlPieFedeology - Ideological Purity in PieFed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t believe software can be neutral. By making banning them equally easy as not, we’re saying that those choices are of equal worth - doing that is taking a side and it’s the side of giving fascists an easier way in. Nope! That’s how Mastodon gets forked into Truth Social.

    Interesting how this thread started out about me being too right wing and now for other people it’s about me being too left wing. Heh.

    Can’t please everyone and I’m not trying to.






  • Rimu@piefed.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.mlPieFedeology - Ideological Purity in PieFed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m happy to explain. You could have just asked, though.

    During initial installation PieFed downloads a big list of 3000 right-wing domains from https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon and blocks them all. Admins can unblock them if they want but they would need to do them individually so I bet none do.

    The list includes things like fox news, breitbart, etc. Before starting work on PieFed I spent 3? years studying right wing disinformation - qanon, antivax, all that and that blocklist is an output from that. Every site on that list was reviewed personally.

    So.

    Additionally, I have manually added these warnings (not blocks) onto some domains, for piefed.social only. You can download a list of those warnings from https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/warnings.ods

    Most of them are tabloids, AI slop farms and a handful are authoritarian government mouthpieces.

    So there’s 3000 right wing sites that simply can’t be linked to and 47 sites with warnings, about 10% of which are left wing. There’s no need to warn for fascism because posts that link to them are not displayed in the first place.

    There’s an ideological slant to PieFed for sure, and it’s very much in favor of the left. That could be why maga.place and lemmychan.org use Lemmy and not PieFed.

    I’ll take another look at peoplesdispatch and see if there’s a less triggering warnings I can put on it.