• HrabiaVulpes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Ain’t it the same parliament that recently passed mass invigilation of EU citizens without a vote?

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Quite the contrary. That mass surveilance was pushed through by the EU commision against the parliament that already rejected it (twice).

      • unglueclass23@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That mass surveilance was pushed through by the EU commision against the parliament that already rejected it (twice).

        Commision and the council. Especially the most recent chat control 1.0 proposal that the parliament will vote for tomorrow (July 9)

        EU ambassadors agree to push a temporary revival — unprecedented, as Parliament’s rejection was considered final. Because an expired regulation cannot be extended, the Council proposes a formally new law with identical content via an expedited procedure.

        https://fightchatcontrol.eu/chat-control-overview