Always fun to develop a record-selling game. You lose your job as a thanks! 🤮

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Depends what you define as “AAA”

    Baldurs Gate 3, for instance, has no nonsense, and every word out of the director’s mouth is “we made this decision because it’s what our developers wanted.” But while the dev team is “AAA” large, Larian doesn’t really fit the mould of Ubisoft, EA, Rockstar, Blizzard or whatever.

    I think we need a new designation for what are basically megacorp operations.

    • wraithcoop@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think they self-defined themselves as AAAA because infinite growth has infected their every thought so the number of As must go up too

    • afromustache@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean honestly aaa at this point to me kinda has an ironic meaning. It just refers to big budget shit titles that have tons of marketing behind them. I would never refer to an actually good game as aaa because the vast majority of aaa studios make bad, buggy, unfinished, and overpriced.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So we call them what they are: megacorp games!

        I just don’t like the term “AAA.” It feels like these mega studios are hiding behind that as a badge of quality.