• Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Archive.today owner looks like a clown.

    I had no idea they were doing all kinds of nefarious shit like that.

  • null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wikipedia not having their own archives by now is a huge vulnerability.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Them hosting their own archives of copyrighted articles would need to be non-public (for citation verification only), since if they did an archive.today-like public service, it would certainly get them sued by a constant carousel of copyright owners until they run out of money.

      Archive.org might be a sign that most would look the other way, but given how tight Wikipedia’s funding is, I don’t think that’s a good idea.

    • maus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Especially given the amount of money they’ve raised. Insane that at this point they didn’t have a system to automatically archive any sources automatically

  • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pepperage Farm remembers when Wikipedia was mass transitioning citations to archive sites because the original sites couldn’t be trusted to retain the information over time.

    Oh how the turn tables.