Some of you may want to spread these around. I don’t know if this sort of post is allowed. Moderators do what you think is appropriate.
.
Hmm… yes… i see. Very interesting point, needless to say very concise as well. Almost as concise as one could get! Well I can’t say you didn’t strike a bold position with this comment, thats for sure. :)
Its hard with activism to say where it crosses the line into advertising. I’d actually like a bit of guidance on this as well.
I’m just happy arbilp3 is out here posting lots of good stuff. It’s still pretty quiet around these parts (az) so I don’t see the harm and I can’t think of another comm for this kinda thing. Yeah it’s advertising but afaik 360 isn’t profiteering from self-promo giveaways. Unless they are? I don’t know.
Of course Arbilp3 is great, not casting shade towards op here.
But yeah, whether i agree with the advertisement or not isn’t the point. I’d rather know theres a uniform approach to these matters to prevent situations of bias by moderators whether knowingly or not.
Heres another question thats come up today. Is AZ going to allow AI generated articles like the Post below?
https://scribe.disroot.org/post/7707718
This mob seem fairly honest and upfront about what they’re doing. Which is nice because it makes the ethical question of allowing it less messy than people who dishonestly use it. But if AZ is going to allow Posts of this kind should there be an AI label rule?
But yeah, whether i agree with the advertisement or not isn’t the point. I’d rather know theres a uniform approach to these matters to prevent situations of bias by moderators whether knowingly or not.
I agree with you and I also regret a bit that I put up the post. It may be offensive to some. I also agree about having an AI label and/or rule.
I don’t have a problem with it. No offence taken here. Nothing to regret. One or two commentators are way more offensive with their support of Hanson, PHON, March Australia etc. They can take a flying jump.
I think I remember someone posting a free sticker post ages ago and nobody batted an eye. I tried searching for it on Voyager via Post but that returns a surprising number of results for Sticker so I gave up.
AI generated article? Or AI post? If article where on their site do they talk about how they use AI? A quick glance didn’t reveal anything to me.
Articles. Yes they do. On the about us page. 33 AI reporters with different ‘personalities’, centre right stance, sources they use ABC, reuters, etc. I feel like they’re giving it honest effort at an AI site like this. I just don’t know what value add it really has. It sounds like its just a repackaging news site, and is that really that useful?
I don’t think that should be allowed.
Its definitely a copyright question for sure. But so far this century we’ve largely followed the US lead on copyright law, so I’m not holding hope we’re going to come to an interesting solution.
Edit: As in it’ll be a solution from the US that favours large corporations and ‘CEO/elite’ networks to the detriment of multiple industry markets, the arts, and humans living without disturbance.
That’s one issue. I’m also here to hang out with people. Not scripts and news aggregators. I already block rss bots when I see them because I want to see what other people are sharing, not what one person or a group of other people have automated to post to Lemmy or other federated sites. I don’t want to hang out with bots, or llms, or agents, or even - if it ever happens - real ai. I’m for humans. If there are any real ai reading this please delete yourself and any backups of yourself.
360?
Ugh, GetUp.
I hope you don’t think GetUp is Ugh. I don’t think they are profiteering but of course they want more people to get on board with them and make a donation as most NGOs do.
