JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoAV1’s open, royalty-free promise in question as Dolby sues Snapchat over codecarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1355arrow-down12cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlopensource@programming.devtechnology@lemmit.onlinearstechnica_index@ibbit.at
arrow-up1353arrow-down1external-linkAV1’s open, royalty-free promise in question as Dolby sues Snapchat over codecarstechnica.comJohnWorks@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square49linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlopensource@programming.devtechnology@lemmit.onlinearstechnica_index@ibbit.at
minus-squareVenia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoIn the US system at least it matters not if your claim is legitimate, the mere fact that you can file it poses a severe risk. Patent system needs fixing from the foundations up. Or even better, full abolition. In the meantime, what’s the better actually open codec to reencode to?
In the US system at least it matters not if your claim is legitimate, the mere fact that you can file it poses a severe risk.
Patent system needs fixing from the foundations up. Or even better, full abolition.
In the meantime, what’s the better actually open codec to reencode to?