• pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even if you do get this to produce appreciable amounts of light, this seems like a really good way to have these plants spread outside of their designated areas and fuck up wildlife even more than our artificial lighting does already.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Given that these plants would need to devote a significant amount of resources to store the energy in order to produce light, I would expect they would be outcompeted by regular plants that aren’t wasting their energy in the wild. Selection pressures generally favor efficient use of energy.

      • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your reasoning makes sense but we can’t really be sure until we let their seeds loose in the wild and see how they do. Bioluminescent animals and algae do exist. There’s no reason why there couldn’t be some unforeseen selective benefit that would allow these mutated glowing plants to thrive

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Anything could happen obviously, but it’s not really fundamentally different from something evolving naturally either. If there is some benefit to this, we might see a new kind of ecosystem developing around these plants. That’s always a risk with biology.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    for fuck sakes, no.

    These have a dim glow similar to mushrooms, no one is going to light a city with that.

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen one of those glowing petunias in real life, it’s laughable that glowing plants could illuminate anything like a park or a street.

    Don’t get me wrong, it was cool af, but it’s not the future of lighting

    • bassad@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not laughable, it is good to have one more option.

      As I answered in an other comment : You don’t always need a bright light, lots of cities even cut lights few hours at night (0-5 am) to preserve both energy and dark sky for biodiversity.

      Some glowing petunias would be an option to show a path