Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 个月前Happy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!imagemessage-square163linkfedilinkarrow-up1957arrow-down145
arrow-up1912arrow-down1imageHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 个月前message-square163linkfedilink
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 个月前https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·1 个月前So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 个月前Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source. What do you want more? Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 个月前You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 个月前We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 个月前Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 个月前Sorry, my autocorrect failed me. I corrected.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·1 个月前So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 个月前I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 个月前Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 个月前For sure, that’s why I passed then. Stop talking nonsense please.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 个月前You used Wikipedia as a source and passed? Standards sure have dropped
And those would be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section
I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source.
What do you want more?
Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
He, not ‘it’
Sorry, my autocorrect failed me. I corrected.
So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool
For sure, that’s why I passed then.
Stop talking nonsense please.
You used Wikipedia as a source and passed?
Standards sure have dropped