A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 天前Well...imagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1185arrow-down123
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imageWell...A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 天前message-square24linkfedilink
minus-squarelurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·15 天前rights imply laws. laws aren’t anarchist.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-215 天前You should probably understand the concept behind human rights before you talk about either anarchism or liberalism, both of which accept the idea.
minus-squaretoo_high_for_this@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·14 天前No rulers is not the same as no rules.
minus-squaregurty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·14 天前That implies that you can’t have any rights unless the government says you can have them.
rights imply laws. laws aren’t anarchist.
You should probably understand the concept behind human rights before you talk about either anarchism or liberalism, both of which accept the idea.
No rulers is not the same as no rules.
That implies that you can’t have any rights unless the government says you can have them.