I mean you can disagree with the accredited crime researcher and the NCVS data he used (it is a move I guess) all you want, but I’ve posted the source where I got my claims, so “unsourced” is verifiably false, it’s right there.
More water = more people drown, it’s not any more difficult than that, ban water.
Oh sorry I didn’t realize I was talking to the great Bill Cheddar, foremost US crime statistics expert and king of all knowledge. How silly of me to not recognize you my liege.
Did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough? Don’t want to accidentally stroke your clearly already too massive ego. In case it wasn’t clear I’m going with “the guy who went to school for it” over “lemmy dickhead.”
Better than “appeal to nuh-uh.” You’ve put forth nothing of an argument beyond “you quoted the wrong name in the article.” Which has been resolved, yet you still screech “nuh-uh” at the heavens. Forgive me if you’re less than convincing.
Again, your unsourced bullshit is not an actual summation of verifiable data.
It’s just right-wing talking points, dude, with the veneer of pseudoscience.
More guns = more people die from guns. It’s not any more difficult than that.
I mean you can disagree with the accredited crime researcher and the NCVS data he used (it is a move I guess) all you want, but I’ve posted the source where I got my claims, so “unsourced” is verifiably false, it’s right there.
More water = more people drown, it’s not any more difficult than that, ban water.
You can keep posting right-wing jerkoff fantasy as much as you want. Doesn’t change the fact that the guy got his science wrong.
Oh sorry I didn’t realize I was talking to the great Bill Cheddar, foremost US crime statistics expert and king of all knowledge. How silly of me to not recognize you my liege.
Did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough? Don’t want to accidentally stroke your clearly already too massive ego. In case it wasn’t clear I’m going with “the guy who went to school for it” over “lemmy dickhead.”
Appeal to authority?
Tell us again how you’re not a dishonest hack?
Better than “appeal to nuh-uh.” You’ve put forth nothing of an argument beyond “you quoted the wrong name in the article.” Which has been resolved, yet you still screech “nuh-uh” at the heavens. Forgive me if you’re less than convincing.