• robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m really surprised to hear that somewhere in the EU doesn’t cover the cost of preventative vaccines. In the USA, even the most basic insurance covers vaccines for HPV and a bunch of other stuff.

    • chaitae3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      At least in Germany, insurance generally only covers the vaccines recommended by a federal expert group of physicians and statisticians called the Stiko, standing committee on vaccination, who tend to be conservative in their recommendations. The HPV vaccine is only recommended for under 18 year olds and it can be difficult to find a physician who will go against the recommendation for liability reasons.

      • Pyrodexter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Wait, what? Difficult to find a physician who will give you an HPV vaccine even if you pay for it?

        I find that hard to believe. I’d imagine the STIKO recommendations are the German implementation of a national vaccination schedule. That wouldn’t mean they’re in any way against other vaccines, just that those are not deemed vital for population safety.

        But I’m just guessing here. Difficulties in getting required vaccines seems completely insane.

        • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If you’re over 18 you most likely already have been exposed to HPV so a vaccine is pointless. Not a doctor might be wrong, but that’s the rationale behind only giving it to minors.

          • Pyrodexter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I can understand that rationale, but that just makes it less useful for adults (at least probabilistically). That doesn’t mean adults should be prevented from getting one, just be advised that they likely already have the immunity.

    • def@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That 87€ would likely be the standard price without any additional coverage though.

      Still does seem a bit pricey if its just one shot but also seems like a number OOOP just made up on a guesstimate.

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Idk about one shot, at least in USA they give you 3 different shots with 9 months between the first one and the last one

    • Grilipper54@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      In the United States even the most basic health insurance is hundreds of dollars a month. I imagine it’s cheaper in European countries.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Except Switzerland. Yaay second most expensive healthcare system in the world over here.

          And you know why? Because we have a system of private insurance, with various band aid fixes aimed at preventing the worst outcomes. It’s better than what the US gets, but not a good system because it’s still fundamentally wrong.

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            This is a silly point to make. Right wingers always make this point because they hate for rich people to ever have to contribute to society.

            A well designed taxation system takes from people in rough proportion to ability to pay and then distributes to people in rough proportion of need.

            So yeah, it cost someone somewhere something, but the fact that you can rock up at the maternity unit, std clinic or cancer specialist without your credit card in civilised countries is called free healthcare, and whingeing about how much some higher rate taxpayer could have spent on a supercar or yacht or second home if we didn’t use that money to save someone’s life is silly.

            Yeah, ok, so everything in healthcare costs something to somebody but now the word free has no meaning in relation to goods and services, so we can’t use ever it?! Nope nope nope. Free has a meaning that’s very clear in this context, this is free healthcare and it’s good.

            I’m sick of “won’t anybody think of the poor higher rate taxpayers?”. No. They’re not poor. Literally. Fix the tax system so that global corporations, multimillionaires and billionaires pay at a rate that approaches regular income tax, and everyone except the grotesquely wealthy will have a more reasonable tax bill and we can all have nice things.

      • robocall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair point. There is Medicaid for the poor in the USA. It covers vaccines, and like 40% of births in the US are covered by Medicaid. But for those that earn too much it sucks to pay for insurance.

          • blujan@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            In mexico is all 100% but at the age and rythm dictated by government officials (doctors, at least).

            Some optional vaccines (think second shots for non endemic illneses for example) are paid but even then you can get them for free if they have them in health centers.