• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I mean, that would sanction being against a… great many ordinary things.

    That being said, it doesn’t matter much at this point. Renewables are advancing so fast, and are so far along, that they’ll supplant nuclear for all but a handful of functions anyway. Renewable future let’s goooo

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Fair enough. I assumed you meant more casualties than the environmental effects, which is my bad.

        (though it is inhabitable even now in most places, with radiation levels having dropped dramatically in most of the exclusion zone, just… not recommended. Long-term cancer risks and all that - living there would be like working as a coal miner, which is obviously undesirable to deal with)

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          There are regions throughout Europe, all the way into Germany, where you can’t safely eat wild mushrooms, and certain wild animals to this day due to contamination from Chernobyl.