• HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Its not exactly a matter of “it costs too much”, as it is a matter of “do we want the Earth to still be habitable by 2100?”

    IMO the money that should be pumped into fighting climate change should dwarf both world wars, the cost of the entire cold war, and every nation should spend more money on it, than their own militaries.

    This isn’t happening, so we’re extremely likely to meet our end. We’ll find that cost of safer energy, such as nuclear, wasn’t such a great cost in the end, when extinction was the alternative.