• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re not mutually exclusive. I’d argue it’s easier to work on the no death solution under a slow death regime than a fast one. We’ve still got a lot of work to do to get to an ideal solution. Lesser evil solutions ensure slightly more favorable conditions while we do that work.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.deBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      we all are working for it but clearly aren’t there yet, to draw a parallel, we don’t have a cure for cancer YET but you can bet your ass i’m gonna do chemo if i end up with it

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But how is liberalism [the slow death cult] going to get us there. Liberalism has been the dominant system for the past 70 years. And I’d say we’re worse off economically then we were in the 60s.

          • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            We could squabble about specifics for a long time. But using a broad definition. Yes, you are absolutely 100% correct. I was thinking with a narrow 20th century defintion.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.deBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Liberalism has been the dominant system for the past 70 years

          8/14 presidents were republican. that’s the majority, for those of you that can’t do math

          And I’d say we’re worse off economically then we were in the 60s.

          doesnt take much for a billionaire-backed asshole to undo decades of progress cough trump