- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
You must log in or # to comment.
aint nothin’ greener than flexing on the poors
It also said that the CO2 footprint related to the operation of aircraft, not the manufacturing of them.
Wow. That is some weasel word logic if ever i’ve seen it.
We’ll that is great! So all they have to do is manufacture private jets that billionaires can then hang on their ceilings, but never fly.
So either somebody bought a few people on this court or the court is dumb as fuck as the arguments are either nonsensical to the point that a highschooler could figure it out, or they’re flat out lies
I would expect this from the US because there they pull this shit all day, but in Europe? Come on, you’re better than that. Be better than that
The court noted that the Commission had failed to take into account that private jets could be flown on sustainable fuel.
Ex-fucking-cuseme?
There is no sustainable fuel, at least not the type that won’t generate CO2, WHICH IS THE ENTIRE POINT OF THIS.
Yeah you can grow biofuels, then you have the exact same fuel coming from a different source. Awesome. STILL GENERATES THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF CO2 YOU TWATS
