• thanksforreading@lemmy.mlBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    25 days ago

    If communists don’t love authority then why promote a political system centred around it. There are literally thousands of different flavours but you chose this one.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      25 days ago

      Any ideology that supports the existence of a state at any point is “authoritarian.” What matters most is which class controls that authority. When the working classes control the state, as communists wish to establish (and have), this creates more freedom and quality of life for the working classes. The state is a tool, not an ideal.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          25 days ago

          Because the state exists as long as classes exist, and classes will continue to exist until production and distribution is fully collectivized. This requires highly advanced productive forces and the full conquest of political power by the working classes, which is a far way off.

          • thanksforreading@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            25 days ago

            That’s coherent and very possibly true but from where I am sitting Communism is just as far off as the end of the global order of statehoods.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              25 days ago

              Sure? Communism is a post-socialist mode of production and distribution characterized by fully collectivized means of production and distribution. It’s stateless, classless, and moneyless. Socialism is immediate and already exists, and thus is the next step.