In 1775, a year before the Declaration of Independence was signed, a Harvard professor named Edward Wigglesworth did the math on American population growth and could barely contain his excitement. He had found that the colonists were doubling their numbers every 25 years, mostly through births, and at that pace he projected that by the close of the 20th century there would be “ONE THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED AND EIGHTY MILLIONS” of us (his capitalization, not mine). A billion Americans, and then some.
Sadly, there are only about 340 million of us today. We should be asking not just why we so badly undershot Wigglesworth’s hopes, but also whether we are about to start counting down instead of up.
If America’s population does decline, it will strain our entitlements system, damage the economy, reduce innovation and entrepreneurship, and cause serious labor shortages. But the majority point of view — held by major institutions like the Census Bureau, the United Nations and the Social Security trustees — is that the United States probably won’t face population decline until the 2080s, or even beyond 2100.
It really shouldn’t be surprising that the populace is declining after the tax system and medical insurance system we have in place. When you give all the food (money via tax breaks, which makes health-insurance easier to afford) to one group but not the other (rich over everyone else), don’t be surprised when the other group doesn’t have kids. The food pot is a zero-sum game. So, when all the food is going to one group, hunger sets in for the others. This means they don’t have kids.


Then look at the also old but far more recent and science-based studies in the Limits to Growth work. And how reasonably close we are to finding those limits, even if that study lacked newer data and didn’t include climate change. Seems that the organizations listed in that quote aren’t factoring in any changes coming soon. Much like the IPCC and their “everything is fine, future tech will save us” stance.