• JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A good opportunity to remind everyone that a vastly superior alternative to Organic Maps already exists: Osmand.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or perhaps it’s your software stack. I’ve used it constantly for well over a decade, every day, on multiple devices, and crashes have been vanishingly rare.

          • MaxMalRichtig@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “It doesn’t work for me.” Your argument is also just an anecdote.

            Personally, I love OsmAnd because of the power features. In the best sense “it works for me”. However, I would recommend OM to not-so-nerdy friends and family as it is just simpler to use and understand due to the fewer features.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would disagree. I have both and use each for different tasks.

      OSMAnd is clunky and unintuitive. I have learned it well and have it setup for land navigation type stuff. It’s incredibly good at displaying every last detail of the topography.

      Organic Maps is fantastic for city navigation. It’s smooth and quick and ever since the addition of turn-by-turn voice navigation I’m in love. I use the Sherpa Onnx voices and they sound so lifelike.

    • Pleat1752@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Organic Maps is better for “normal” users if you ask me. Osmand is better for pro users but quite clunky.