• disorderly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It certainly means I get to review a lot of code that the author doesn’t understand. That alone makes me wish we could put the cat back in the bag.

  • username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    It did. I spend magnitudes less time browsing docs and can concentrate on actual programming. LLMs are very nice at searching docs for something you are not sure that even exists.

    • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except when the bot tells you it exists, but it doesn’t. This can be managed with some prompt-fu, but it’s still annoying sometimes.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I use quite a few niche libraries and the hallucination rate is unacceptably high.
        I find it works for popular libraries though.

      • username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Still better than looking for it manually. Checking results is easier than doing the search manually. Manual search is especially fun if you don’t know the terminology.