Desperately trying to find a use-case for their inferior AI. I feel like their idea pool was always at absolute 0 but now it’s going even below that.

Let’s have MetaAI raise our kids everyone!

  • neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Back when I was at the bedtime story stage I just went for the books I enjoyed as a kid. We got though the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings, some of the Narnia books and some others. Even if they don’t know all the words that’s ok the best stories just carry you along. The youngest should be on picture books not screens but the main thing is, you are there and reading with them because that time is priceless.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Obviously don’t trust Meta to deliver content to a child, but how is this different than other forms of media that kids are already ingesting on TV, or phones or tablets?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Because LLMs are really bad at telling stories.

      …Look, I’m an advocate for LLMs here. I was using 6B models to mess around with roleplaying and storywriting in like 2022, with GPT-J finetunes. But that’s with human guidance, using it as a tool or “sounding board.”

      They’re fascinating writing aids.

      But by themself, unattended, off-the-shelf LLMs have a horrendous architecture for writing long form stories, basically. They go off the rails at the drop of a hat, and cannot self correct. They lose track of the longer context, and write things that don’t make sense. They have weird, very inhuman patterns of using the same character names and ideas, or mimicking prose from earlier in the context where it’s not applicable at all. Their prose is terrible in an eerie, repetitive way.

      So for children, there’s a risk of:

      • Not-safe-for-family content popping up literally randomly, in the middle of the story, which a parent might miss skimming.

      • Weird, nonsensical storylines I would classify as “brainrot”

      • Very repetitive themes and ideas, basically a lack of variety.

      • Instilling strange linguistic habits.

      • Emotions and tone that don’t line up with the content, especially when TTS is used (as most TTS models aren’t tightly integrated into the main LLM; they’re tiny, dumb models reading a script blind, with no context).


      …Have you seen any horror movies where something is supposed to be human, or acting like it, but it isn’t quite right? Because it clearly doesn’t understand, its just mimicking?

      That’s the risk here, one you wouldn’t get even with TikTok doomscrolling. And that’s the best case scenario, without even getting into influence ops, engagement maximization techniques, or enshittification Meta is notorious for.

      Researchers have built finetunes with frameworks to try and improve autonomous LLM writing, but as someone who’s followed their research, I can tell you there’s a zero percent chance Meta implemented it.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I still don’t see the big difference here between this and letting kids watch YouTube, especially with so much AI content anyways. And I’ve read some really bad kids stories that were supposedly written by people.

        At the end of the day it’s just another thing for parents to parent on.