your headline is a lie. “not accepting their offer” is not the same as “accepting their offer then just not showing up”. to pretend otherwise is disingenuous.
don’t get me wrong, this is a bit unhinged but you’re overshadowing a good point by clickbait lying right off the bat.
I live in an ‘at will’ state, this means that either I or my employer can end my employment at any time for any reason. As you can imagine this is both good and wildly abused by employers.
The good part is that the employer is not afraid of hiring someone. I’m from somewhere where employment is a serious commitment - after some time of employment, it’s very, very hard to let someone go.
The consequence is that employers are deadly afraid of getting stuck with someone who is not a good worker, basically forever. It means that salaries stay low, because if you raise a salary you can never bring it down again, and you can’t get rid of that worker. It also means that some workers just stop giving a fuck as soon as they get “tenure” and can’t be let go anymore.
At will employment has a lot of downsides for the worker, but it also means that no one is afraid of hiring and so that you can easily get a job when you need one.
In addition to what the other commenter said it also prevents the employer from obligating you to stay, for instance, by including a provision in your contract that requires notice of your intention cease employment.
It’s worth pointing out that there are no exceptions for anything that would violate state or federal law. Even here you can’t fire somebody for their gender or sexual orientation etc. However, functionally that means the burden of proof is on you to show that you were let go for illegal cause, which can be next to impossible if you aren’t vigilant.
it’s just business. the exchange of labor services for money. nothing personal. I don’t get upset on behalf of starbucks when someone goes to Tim Hortons
Would you be mad at a company that gave you an offer and then after you accepted it (and rejected other offers), they rescinded the offer? If so, then it’s clearly not “just business”.
My guess is that what people here are really trying to say, is that applicants are allowed to rescind their promises, but companies are not.
your headline is a lie. “not accepting their offer” is not the same as “accepting their offer then just not showing up”. to pretend otherwise is disingenuous.
don’t get me wrong, this is a bit unhinged but you’re overshadowing a good point by clickbait lying right off the bat.
downvote.
A BIT unhinged? Brother, are corporations so people now that they can crypost on the timeline?
I wouldn’t ever work for this company and I hope more people see this.
alright yeah, it’s very unhinged.
On the other hand, all the companies have a “trial period” where they can kick you any day just because.
Why wouldn’t an employee apply the same approach?
I live in an ‘at will’ state, this means that either I or my employer can end my employment at any time for any reason. As you can imagine this is both good and wildly abused by employers.
What’s the good part
The good part is that the employer is not afraid of hiring someone. I’m from somewhere where employment is a serious commitment - after some time of employment, it’s very, very hard to let someone go.
The consequence is that employers are deadly afraid of getting stuck with someone who is not a good worker, basically forever. It means that salaries stay low, because if you raise a salary you can never bring it down again, and you can’t get rid of that worker. It also means that some workers just stop giving a fuck as soon as they get “tenure” and can’t be let go anymore.
At will employment has a lot of downsides for the worker, but it also means that no one is afraid of hiring and so that you can easily get a job when you need one.
In addition to what the other commenter said it also prevents the employer from obligating you to stay, for instance, by including a provision in your contract that requires notice of your intention cease employment.
It’s worth pointing out that there are no exceptions for anything that would violate state or federal law. Even here you can’t fire somebody for their gender or sexual orientation etc. However, functionally that means the burden of proof is on you to show that you were let go for illegal cause, which can be next to impossible if you aren’t vigilant.
it’s just business. the exchange of labor services for money. nothing personal. I don’t get upset on behalf of starbucks when someone goes to Tim Hortons
Would you be mad at a company that gave you an offer and then after you accepted it (and rejected other offers), they rescinded the offer? If so, then it’s clearly not “just business”.
My guess is that what people here are really trying to say, is that applicants are allowed to rescind their promises, but companies are not.
I mean not exactly that but close has happened. It’s annoying but these things happen and one moves on.
Based