Feels very redditty, which is why I’m asking…

Also, what are total buffer size (what does it affect) and session waste (what does it affect)? qbittorrent-nox on Linux.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I have (need) a seedbox and can’t really relate. But if you host it on your server that can perma-run it’s not much different to what I am using.
    And just seeding will not guarantee any traffic. I have torrents that I cross-seed with wildly different ratios.

    My advice:
    See if you are even reachable (port-forward/no cg-nat)
    Try to move to a system that can 24/7

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Unless your home internet has multi-gigabit upload, you’ll never be able to compete with seedbox users when new uploads drop and everyone is downloading them at the same time. Your seedbox can upload at 10x-100x the rate my home internet can which is why seedbox users capture all the seeding credit on new uploads. Once a file has been out a day or two, the only people downloading are new users or people who aren’t using automation tools like sonarr/radarr which are few and far between.

      The tradeoff here is that your seedbox storage capacity several orders of magnitude lower than my 50TB home server, so I can keep these files seeding forever much like the parable about the tortoise and the hare (though without the deeper meaning).

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        My seedbox is connected at gbit speed, yep
        But I don’t seed at that.
        Maybe at 5-10 mbps on newer popular stuff and only the large popular ones will I crack the 20 mbps range.

        Why? I suspect SSD seedboxes are “stealing” my rario, too.
        I am also in it for the long game with mine and download the smaller less important releases through usenet.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That still involves downloading shit you don’t want just to get ratio. Which is kinda stupid IMO

      I’m running 24/7, I’ve got one torrent running for 2 years with a ratio of 10 (and not even a small one) while most things get 0 kB up in even a year.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        No? I just download what I want and try to seed it 1:1 (which is hard on private).
        Maybe in the beginning you need to do it to build up buffer and not download yourself into a leech-role.
        But once (my threshold is about 1:250gb (down/up) in ratio) built up, you can just coast along provided you arent downloading every remux you come across.

        And the racing is a serious issue, yes.
        BUT even I can’t compete even with my gbit upload because I am limited by HDDs and the serious ratio farmers use SSDs.

        If I seed stuff it usually comes out to 2-10 mbps for maybe 2,3,4 minutes and that’s it.
        Only the very large (>200GB) torrents are leeched of for longer from me. Probably because so few do continue to seed those behemoths.

        I’m running 24/7, I’ve got one torrent running for 2 years with a ratio of 10 (and not even a small one) while most things get 0 kB up in even a year.

        I have torrents from a tracker that is particular hard to build ratio on.
        Seeding since 2022 and a ratio of .6
        Heres more:

        So no, a seedbox is not the ultimate cheat you make it out to be.
        But it helps circumventing the networking issues :-)