antonim@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoruleimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1424arrow-down19
arrow-up1415arrow-down1imageruleantonim@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoThe problem is they have to over-hype it because they aren’t making their money back. Even frontier models are not yet strong AI aka they seriously need human supervision to check what’s coming out. What do you consider “strong AI”?
minus-squareZephyr@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoStrong AI has the same capabilities as a human mind at minimum.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoThat’s actual AI (what people are now calling AGI), and LLMs aren’t capable of that. They’d have to develop a new technology.
minus-squareZephyr@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI’m not saying this current push strictly is. That said it’s far more capable than one would have assumed for an algorithm just doing next word prediction. There’s something in there that can be distilled.
The problem is they have to over-hype it because they aren’t making their money back.
What do you consider “strong AI”?
Strong AI has the same capabilities as a human mind at minimum.
That’s actual AI (what people are now calling AGI), and LLMs aren’t capable of that. They’d have to develop a new technology.
I’m not saying this current push strictly is. That said it’s far more capable than one would have assumed for an algorithm just doing next word prediction. There’s something in there that can be distilled.