Bin Laden’s plan was to trap the U.S. in expensive, foreign quagmire wars that would trigger a domestic economic collapse. It was patterned on the strategy that the local mujahideen, he and other foreign fighters, and the U.S. and its allies had used to defeat the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

Not only does bin Laden’s strategy continue apace long after his 2011 death, but it also spawned an even more effective means of destroying America from within. Bin Laden’s attacks turned the U.S. government into an engine for the destruction of America, inducing it to implement policies that have devastated the country and immiserated its people. That includes unrestrained spending while cutting taxes on the rich, closer ties with despotic regimes, the sneak-and-peek warrants and roving wiretaps of the Patriot Act and other domestic surveillance programs, and the ruinous failed forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.

In 2001, the U.S. government recorded a budget surplus of about $128 billion and was projected to pay off the national debt by 2009. But after miring the U.S. in forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and elsewhere, bin Laden looked upon the fruits of 9/11 and took a victory lap in 2004, bragging that his strategy of “bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy” had helped to push the U.S. deficit to “more than a trillion dollars.”

“All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note,” bin Laden announced.

Bin Laden’s 2004 trillion-dollar boast wasn’t actually accurate. The U.S. federal deficit was just $413 billion in 2004. But it wouldn’t remain that low for long. America’s post-9/11 wars have now cost or caused long-term obligations to taxpayers of an astonishing $8 trillion, according to a 2021 analysis by Brown University’s Costs of War Project.

  • zigmus64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I appreciate providing sources, but I’m skeptical of anything that’s only been published on instagram. I’d be happy to look at a credible source.

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s what I’m saying. Those users link and discuss the credible sources (newpapers, news coverage, documentaries, interviews, erc) better than I can. It’s not only published on instagram, that’s just the links I posted.

      I’m not going to waste my time this afternoon linking articles for other bots and shills (not you because you seem to have engaged in discussion instead of thoughtless vitriol) to conveniently ignore or push the goal posts further away.

      And before anyone says I’m vitriolic too, my comments are always in response to someone doing it first who needs to be put in their place.

      If anything, I regret trying to awaken anyone and despise the sheep in this shithole.