It means they’re having bareback sex and the man orgasms while inside her.

It should not be tolerated at the workplace. I’m forced to listen to this rhetoric because my shift isn’t done yet, and I can’t leave without getting fired. I’m forced into a sexual discussion without consent, and it’s so graphically disgusting that I feel nauseous.

  • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s not that crazy, but it’s a little uncomfortable to basically just be told that 2 people are rawdogging. It’s nowhere near nausea inducing, and it’s not really a sexual discussion. Would I rather not hear it? Of course. Is it that bad? Not really.

    • stinky@redlemmy.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s nowhere near nausea inducing

      Are you sure? I find it nauseating, so I’m not sure why you’re saying I don’t.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        It should be nowhere near nausea inducing, my mistake. Would you happen to be a sex repulsed asexual?