We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

Then retrain on that.

Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

Source.

More Context

Source.

Source.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    …which has advanced reasoning…

    Does he actually believe this sort of shit?

    Like his constant nattering about self-driving cars or brain/computer interface (or DOGE cost-cutting for that matter). It’s all bludgeoningly obvious bullshit, but I can’t work out if he’s more dishonest or delusional.

    I lean a bit toward delusional — that to at least some notable degree, he actually believes the bullshit he spouts.

    It’s creepy either way.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s going to refine it’s capability until it just starts calling everyone “pedoguy” and stating they are in the Epstein files regardless of the question posed to it.

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    I can’t really comment first hand, but people I know that are heavy in the AI arena career-wise have told me that Grok is pretty much garbage on all fronts.

    Is that true?

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Dude is over there literally trying to shoddily doodle his preferred reality onto the inside of his own little bubble.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I guess that’s right.

        Just that what I meant by “burning down a library” was the loss of information that would occur as a result.
        Referring to historical events of burning down libraries, of which I can recall 2 of. One being the Library of Alexandria and the other being Nalanda Mahavihara.

        In the modern day, where stuff is digitised and mass printed, burning books is not really going to cost loss of said information (much less, scanning it, which would cause nothing except potential loss of revenue to the publisher).
        On the other hand, if you fill the internet with a bunch of false information, such that someone just looking something up, will see the false information way before the actual thing, that would have a similar (even worse) effect on the civilisation.