These sort of liars make plenty of absurd claims and expect people to just believe them because they said so.
The evidence of his actions are the only thing that really matters, and that evidence is pretty damning.
Ride this MF out of town on a railā¦
Do you mean Alex Karp? The windsock?
āI can tell you, without going into things Iām not going to disclose, Iām very balanced, and everyone in the political arena knows it. And Iāll tell you what, Iām also not the village idiot.ā
Progressives are well known for their love of domestic surveillance, so this makes sense.
/S
I know more about being a progressive than almost anybody on the planet
Cringe.
His parents were Marxist I think. His mom (a black woman) makes cool collage art with a progressive bent and is a civil rights activist. His dad was a German Jewish pediatrician and wrote a book on redlining, poverty and how lead poisoning was affecting communities and children.
He was raised with at the very least a very progressive world view. So like, he knows more about being progressive than a lot of people and then chose to do what he does. Thatās worse imo.
Thatās Trumpās circle for you. They all honestly believe theyāre the smartest people on the planet and the rest of us are just in their way.
Karp is so weird because he IS smarter than a lot of people. Heās incredibly intelligent but heās evil lol
He just doesnāt give a fuck about people.
Theyāre all narcissistic and a narcissist doesnāt even interact with reality much at all. They canāt handle reality, so they interact with their warped perception of reality and delusional projections instead. They surround themselves with people who reinforce those delusions. Once you criticize them or introduce some acknowledgement of reality (like the idea that they have flaws or arenāt the best person on earth) they make you their enemy.
So they genuinely believe that if they proclaim something to be true, then it is.
deleted by creator
Idk about ālivingā tbh. Seems more like a ghoul to me.
thiel is controlling his spine.
Palantir helped commit a genocide to assist Israel in exterminating a population that they have had living under an illegal apartheid occupation because they are not āethnically pureā enough to have rights under Alex karpās leadership . Heās a facist
āIā got the rope right hereā
Someone made a Zuck meme where he did this exact thingā¦ That user must be a Diviner, blessed by the holy meatball to nearly predict the right thing through the dankest of memes
I only believe it because I think Alex Karp is 17 people in a single body similar to Being John Malkovich and the progressive personality has been granted control for self preservation.
I could believe hes a leftist. Hes just like the leftists here wanting an authoritarian utopia where the government has total control and rules with an iron boot.
Idiot.
Its all authoritarian all the way down, thats not optional, the option is whether poor people get food. Being poor is also not optional, your job is too expensive and youāre being replaced by a machine.
Have a nice existence.
Being poor is optional but its an assumed given that in any system some will be poor so you should account for that. authoritarian government boot doesnt solve that issue.
Real fucking stupid, idiot.
āYou should account for that.ā Yes, thatās precisely the point. How are you accounting for the people you accept will inevitably be poor?
Youāve read an endorsement of authoritarianism into a comment about how power operates regardless of whoās wielding it in the modern era. Having your livelihood dictated by whoever owns the machines doesnāt magically become freedom because theyāre a private company. And telling people poverty is optional becomes a fairly empty answer when the work theyāre supposed to escape it through is being automated.
You think youve got the answer but it suffers from exactly what i described.
As for what accounting for poverty looks like I can list a number of liberal policy like income support for parents, job seekers, studentās disabled people. The only people who fall 9outside this are people who have no disability and choose not to work. Theyāre usually still supported.
Income support is precisely the sort of thing I mean by accounting for poverty. What part of that do you think Iām opposing?
And āchooses not to workā skips the issue I raised. Being able and willing to work doesnāt guarantee someone is willing to employ you, especially when they can automate the job. How do those people fit into your answer?
tHIEL BEING the supreme commander(anti-christ)/premier of course, while puppeting his lieutenants like karp.
