• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    Calling it affordable broadband while throttling people to 600 Kbps after 50 GB is like selling a discounted bus pass that turns into a pair of shoes after four rides. And hiding the plan from search engines? Apparently the cheapest way to provide low income internet is making sure nobody can find it.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    Artificial static throughput caps on modern networks are asinine and archaic, especially on shared mediums.

    Network providers should permit shared best effort throughput, with a sliding temporal window which keeps a tally of usage and feeds into a ratcheting deprioritisation of slot allocations. This would permit short bursts of maximum throughput, which is more efficient and frees the channel quicker, and slots longer transfers into the remaining default channel space.

    Differentiate service based on the dimensions of the monitored and enforced windows, not an arbitrary static sphincter.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Yeah but how are we going to exploit the poors with a system that works?