Key Takeaways:
Seven months into Project Glasswing, VulnCheck has tracked 442 CVEs attributable to Anthropic, roughly 0.5% of all CVEs published this year, with only two identified as exploited in the wild. Of Anthropic’s 37,966 reported findings, only 7,349 (19.4%) have been made public and just 217 have been marked fixed. Since September, Anthropic has added nearly 12,000 findings while recording just 15 additional fixes, widening the gap between discovery and remediation. Roughly 1,654 findings (4.4%) have been marked as duplicates, nearly eight times the number fixed, and another 419 have been withdrawn. Anthropic’s claimed true positive rate has risen from 90.8% to 94.2%, raising questions about how it accounts for duplicates and withdrawn findings. Anthropic’s OSS Scanner shifts validation work to maintainers, with curl rejecting 19 of 34 published reports as vulnerabilities, confirming six as low severity and leaving nine awaiting assessment. Also putting Anthropic’s true positive rates into question.
What a stupid article, of course all these insane vulnerabilities aren’t going to be made public until at minimum some substantial time has passed after they’ve been fixed. Yes it’s overwhelming but that’s the nature of needing to confront all your security tech debt at once



