They have been threatened with deportation and only by demanding a court to review the decision they got a temporary reprieve
And the same happens when you get a traffic ticket: Until you challenge it in court, the order to pay up and the threat of garnishing your wages looms in the air.
And it is already in the structure of the argument of the administration that they do not want to wait until a court has ruled on any criminal charge
Criminal. Criminal. The administrative court will decide on whether or not the deportation will happen before the criminal case is finished. The administration, of course, is within its rights to have an opinion on that. So the affected people. But the administrative court will decide because this is an administrative matter.
This is at the core about taking away matters from court
No, it isn’t. I explained it like five times now. At this point you’re either deliberately misunderstanding the issue, deliberately misrepresenting the issue, or actually dense.
Administrative courts are courts. Can you acknowledge that.
I said in case of repression against people standing up for Palestinian rights it is the most blatant, the most obvious.
Not Oury Jalloh? Not Gustl Mollath? Do you even have sufficient knowledge of administrative failings and fuckups to make such a call. Very recently, and specifically Berlin, the Adenauer SRP+. Gods bless the ZPS.
I think by pointing out how despotic the deportation to Hungary is, you yourself acknowledge that Germany has a problem with growing despotism.
…you don’t. Or you’d know that it’s been like this for decades. Actually got better, pre-RAF was atrocious and let’s not talk about WWII and before.
Go ahead, argue the Palestinian case, I applaud that. But stop shooting yourself in the foot, hurting the Palestinian case, by making bullshit arguments that are both factually incorrect and tone-deaf AF. Just because it makes you feel good in the moment or something like that doesn’t mean that you’re helping. A bad thing done in the name of a good thing is still a bad thing. Dunno maybe read some Kant or something.
And the same happens when you get a traffic ticket: Until you challenge it in court, the order to pay up and the threat of garnishing your wages looms in the air.
Criminal. Criminal. The administrative court will decide on whether or not the deportation will happen before the criminal case is finished. The administration, of course, is within its rights to have an opinion on that. So the affected people. But the administrative court will decide because this is an administrative matter.
No, it isn’t. I explained it like five times now. At this point you’re either deliberately misunderstanding the issue, deliberately misrepresenting the issue, or actually dense.
Administrative courts are courts. Can you acknowledge that.
Not Oury Jalloh? Not Gustl Mollath? Do you even have sufficient knowledge of administrative failings and fuckups to make such a call. Very recently, and specifically Berlin, the Adenauer SRP+. Gods bless the ZPS.
…you don’t. Or you’d know that it’s been like this for decades. Actually got better, pre-RAF was atrocious and let’s not talk about WWII and before.
Go ahead, argue the Palestinian case, I applaud that. But stop shooting yourself in the foot, hurting the Palestinian case, by making bullshit arguments that are both factually incorrect and tone-deaf AF. Just because it makes you feel good in the moment or something like that doesn’t mean that you’re helping. A bad thing done in the name of a good thing is still a bad thing. Dunno maybe read some Kant or something.