• Hikuro93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Remember. He didn’t back down (for now) because you were hurting as a person.

    He backed down because his constituents - the ultra-rich, aka the ones best equipped of all to weather this storm they themselves asked for - complained that their power and wealth rate was decelerating.

    Simple as. The people who build and maintain societal infrastructure with their sweat and blood would sooner be left to die than these elitists would see their unfathomable and unneeded amounts of influence drop even 1%.

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Almost certainly he backed down because he is manipulating the market and shorting on the whole economy. The whole reason for the stop and go tariffs is to cause market instability and panic selling. He shorts right before he introduces tariffs and buys when the market free falls. Then he pauses the tariffs to build the market back up so he can sell and repeat the whole process. This isn’t about anyone but Trump.

      • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        This isn’t about anyone but Trump.

        💯 everything you said up to that last point…

        I think Peter Thiel and Dark MAGA billionaires are also pretty interested in what’s going on… they literally installed JD Vance as VP to guarantee inside influence over policies which serve their long term anarcho-capitalist fantasies.

  • eltrain123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not a crash… it’s a wealth transfer. They saw how effective economic crisis was for wealth transfer during covid, and they are manufacturing a controllable version of that through on-again-off-again tariffs. The old advice of “stay the course” with your 401k may not be the best course of action anymore. But I’m no expert… time will tell.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “Stay the course” is still the best advice. You don’t actually lose anything as long as you don’t sell. As long as it recovers by the time you retire and start withdrawing from it, it’s fine.

      The main problem would be if Trump’s fuckery deals a fatal wound to the US economy and it never recovers. Even then, you can diversify right now into international stocks to mitigate that chance.

      • sgtgig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Relevant

        And thinking of it this way… if you cash out and lock in losses and stop investing, you’re likely to never or greatly delay your retirement. If you keep investing, even with catastrophic losses in the market, you’ll be buying at the bottom and if you’ve still got enough time before retirement, you should still make it.

  • WanderingThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stock markets don’t create or destroy money. They just move it around. Mostly from the poor to the rich.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Play the game smart, don’t bet more than you can afford to lose, invest in stable funds, not volatile stocks.

        I mean, the game is there, you might as well play it, but be smart about it.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    People called me an idiot for taking my meagre savings out of the bank and putting them in precious metals. How the turntables.