Drew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoWhat could this formula be?imagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down10
arrow-up1124arrow-down1imageWhat could this formula be?Drew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square33linkfedilink
minus-squareOccultist0178@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up53·2 months agoE = mc² + AI must be the obvious answer
minus-squareLittle8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoWhat i think is funny is that AI has to equal 0 so its actually saying that AI is useless So people fond of AI are criticising it themselves XD
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoYeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
minus-squareLittle8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoAs long as AI = 0 it works
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoUnfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoTrue. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.
E = mc² + AI must be the obvious answer
What i think is funny is that AI has to equal 0 so its actually saying that AI is useless
So people fond of AI are criticising it themselves XD
Yeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
As long as AI = 0 it works
Unfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
I is 0, as it is nonexistent
True. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.