• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Elections are run by the states including for federal office. They are not run by the federal government

    Nor are there is no provision anywhere to cancel elections due to war. They still happened during the US Civil war

    Hell even if in a hypothetical that it was just blue states that held elections, that would be enough to potentially flip the house. California and New York have enough potential and realistic house flips to change the US from red to blue

    Declaring that they won’t happen just plays into Trump’s hands. It makes people more cynical and less inclined to fight back

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Good thing the majority of state Governors are not Republican and would not welcome interventions from a fascist federal government. Oh wait…

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        even if in a hypothetical that it was just blue states that held elections, that would be enough to potentially flip the house. California and New York have enough potential and realistic house flips to change the US from red to blue

        • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          OK. That’s a wild thing to say. If you’re willing to say that the red states may illegally fail to hold elections can you not recognize the likelyhood that they’d stop, by force, blue states from doing the same?

          Do you seriously think blue states wouldn’t fold if pressured to stop elections?

          I’m not convinced that any of this will come to pass and elections will be stopped but if they want to they can and will.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Because they do have power if they’re willing to use it. It can slow them down. For instance,

        They have subpoenas. Make republicans have to spend all their time talking about all the horrible things they’re doing to the floor. Remove all their time to do said horrible things because they’re too busy testifying

        If they don’t testify, they can put people in contempt of congress which can be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms. This is something that did happen to Steve Bannon when he refuesed to testify for the Jan 6th committee. Not just a hypothetical power

        • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Who enforces those subpoenas? Who enforces the contempt charges? Trump is in charge of all of the enforcement mechanisms.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            If they don’t testify, they can put people in contempt of congress which can be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms.

            The Sergeant at Arms as I wrote. They are part of congress. They are not part of the executive branch


            Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment, imprisonment for coercion, or release from the contempt citation).[18]

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress

            The sergeant at arms of the United States House of Representatives is an officer of the House with law enforcement, protocol, and administrative responsibilities. The sergeant at arms is elected at the beginning of each Congress by the membership of the House.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergeant_at_Arms_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Because they do have power if they’re willing to use it. It can slow them down. For instance,

          Chuck Schumer had that power last week. Look how well that turned out. That’s what you’re basing your hopes on?

          They have subpoenas. Make republicans have to spend all their time talking about all the horrible things they’re doing to the floor. Remove all their time to do said horrible things because they’re too busy testifying

          Actually, no. Democrats have no subpoena power or ability to hold official hearings while in the minority.

          If they don’t testify, they can put people in contempt of congress which can be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms. This is something that did happen to Steve Bannon when he refuesed to testify for the Jan 6th committee. Not just a hypothetical power

          I wouldn’t exactly use Steve Bannon as a prime example. It took years for him to see any consequence at all, and he got a bare minimum. He got, what, 4 months? For the amount of money Bannon is making off of riding Trump’s dick, I’d sit in a jail cell for 4 months too.

          And I’ll counter your argument with Jim Jordan. Ignored subpoenas. Didn’t even get so much as a censure in the house for ignoring their own subpoena, let alone any form of punishment at all. If you for half a second think a Republican-led House is going to charge a prominent, full-throated MAGA member and chair of the Judiciary Committee with contempt, order his arrest, and have him jailed for non-compliance, I have beachfront property on Mars you may be interested in.

          Your rationale goes on the premise that traditional norms and laws still apply. They do not. When the people who are in charge of enforcing those laws and norms are actively telling you that they’re not going to enforce them, those laws aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on.

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Histrionics aren’t helpful even when they’re factual, let alone when they aren’t.

        • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          It’s helpful to point out to people that following established rules doesn’t work when the people in power disregard them with impunity.

          There’s not going to be a legal or political uno reverse card that will stop what’s happening. The only established mechanism that still exists to get us out of this is if the military does its duty and protects us from the domestic threat to the constitution.

          But, with Trump replacing the joint chiefs and top JAG members, I’m not betting on that happening.

          People need to stop living in the fantasy of, “we just have to wait it out for 2-4 years.”