• Old Jimmy Twodicks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m bending the premise a little bit: The Boys is based on a graphic novel and bears almost no resemblance to the source material. I think the show is way more compelling and engaging than the graphic novel, probably because the show is written to be aggressively topical, while the graphic novel concluded over a decade ago.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also I’ve heard that the comic is gruesome, gratuitous, and horrifying just for the sake of it.

      • Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, the author, Garth Ennis, seems to be pretty polarizing in comic book fandom based on what I read on Reddit over the years. I haven’t actually read any of his work but from what I gather, being edgy the sake of being edgy is his thing.

        Another series based on one of his books that people say is better than the source material is Preacher.

        • DibbleDabble@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Preacher series does not come close to the quality of the source material. The comics are far better than the series, in my opinion.

          • Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, what I was saying is definitely not a universal opinion. It’s just that Ennis’ work seems to be more for some than others. What I’ve seen people say is that they prefer it toned down a little bit, as adaptations tend to do. Wouldn’t mind taking a look at the comic and seeing for myself though.