• SatyrSack@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I cannot remember the details that led to this opinion, but I remember preferring the first season of Dexter to the novel that it was based on. I think that was the only season that was even close to a direct adaptation of the novels, but I liked the changes that were made.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The show was consistently better except what they did with Doakes. Doakes innthe books still chases after Dexter after having been mutilated to a killer. He was in a chair without a tongue still trying to get Dexter Morgan.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I could not disagree more. The show’s decision to ground everything in the “real world” changed Dexter from an avenging angel to a person with emotional/psychological problems that are actually pretty far removed from reality.

        The conceit of a “dark passenger” that identified evil, rather than just Dexter’s subjective decisions or evidence-based judgements brought Dexter into a certainty that is missing in the show, and ultimately planted the seeds of doom for the series. Once Dexter is ambivalent it’s over.

        IMO

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Really? Time for a re-read.

            Just checked and you are mistaken. Book one chapter one is full of references. Starts in the third paragraph.

      • SatyrSack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, he didn’t die at the end of the first book? Or did we just think he died, but he came back later or something?