In aĀ report released Friday,Ā the committee said that Ocasio-Cortez āproactively took steps to complyā with House rules, including using personal funds to rent apparel that would typically be gifted or loaned to Met Gala attendees.
But the report states that,Ā ādespite Representative Ocasio-Cortezās significant attempts, the Committee found that she failed to fully comply with the Gift Rule by impermissibly accepting a gift of free admission to the 2021 Met Gala for her partner and by failing to pay full fair market value for some of the items worn to the event.ā
The ethics panel said it did not find evidence that Ocasio-Cortez āintentionally underpaidā for costs related to the event, and that āin many instances,āĀ she had relied on a campaign staffer to handle discussions of payment and the advice of her counsel to determine the amounts.
. . . The ethics committee alsoĀ released a separate reportĀ related to Rep. Mike Kelly, a Pennsylvania Republican,Ā and allegations that his wife may have bought stock in a steel company based on confidential or nonpublic information he learned in his role as a congressman.
The committee said that it reviewed allegations referred by the Office of Congressional Conduct and ādid not find evidence that he knowingly or intentionally caused his spouse to trade based on insider information.ā
But the report said that the panelĀ ādid not receive full cooperation from Mrs. Kelly and was therefore unable to determine whether her stock purchase was improper.ā
The report concluded by saying that āRepresentative Kelly should ensure that he and Mrs. Kelly divest of all shares of Cleveland-Cliffs before taking any further official action relating to the company.ā
This some bull shit right here.
No, if her staff took it upon themselves to do something unethical without her knowledge or consent, that does not reflect negatively on her. Particularly as she was demonstrating good ethical behavior by paying for things others were allowed to borrow, trying to pay market price, etc. If she became aware of that sort of behavior and THEN did nothing to correct this, then THAT would reflect poorly on her.
No one is responsible for the unintended, unauthorized and unethical behavior others take upon themselves to do without that personās knowledge. And the entire point of having the staff is to be able to rely upon them to do things for you which requires an amount of trust. Because if youāre directly involved with, and/or reviewing and confirming that everything they do is exactly right, you may as well be doing it yourself.
My wifeās family owns a fireworks store. We do not specifically train people not to steal, not to hit customers, not to sell drugs in the store, etc. We are not standing over the shoulders of every employee validate their every action nor viewing the cameras every minute of every day to verify they did everything right. That doesnāt mean we are responsible for their actions if they do those sorts of things without our intention, consent or knowledge. If we find out about any of those things, that person is dealt with appropriately. Failing to hold them accountable would be to implicitly permit it, which would make you negligent and indirectly responsible. But only once you know about it and fail to correct it is that the case.