Kissaki@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoThe Pain That is GitHub Actions - Feldera Blogwww.feldera.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThe Pain That is GitHub Actions - Feldera Blogwww.feldera.comKissaki@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoJust self host an open source runner like woodpecker and you’ll never have to move again hell you can even self host github actions via act
minus-squareruneko@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThis. As someone who migrated an organization’s repos from a self hosted Git server to GitHub (begrudgingly) and then back to a self hosted Git server again when it didn’t meet the business needs … emphatically this.
minus-square0xDEADBEEFCAFE@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago Just self host an open source runner like woodpecker and you’ll never have to move again How painful is the setup and general maintenance/security? I’m considering the idea but I just don’t want to deal with people abusing exploits in the actions that give them access to my LAN.
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIf you’re working with a team, you can only let certain people trigger checks
Just self host an open source runner like woodpecker and you’ll never have to move again
hell you can even self host github actions via
actThis. As someone who migrated an organization’s repos from a self hosted Git server to GitHub (begrudgingly) and then back to a self hosted Git server again when it didn’t meet the business needs … emphatically this.
How painful is the setup and general maintenance/security?
I’m considering the idea but I just don’t want to deal with people abusing exploits in the actions that give them access to my LAN.
If you’re working with a team, you can only let certain people trigger checks