Originally Posted By u/q0_0p At 2025-08-10 08:00:14 PM | Source


  • Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    So you are talking about a full overhaul of the system, not just a change on how the politicians are payed.

    In your view, who would be a good politician? Because a short-term self sacrificing position works in the context of a “noble” ruling class that has the skills and connections to rise to the occasion at any time. But I doubt that is what you are advocating. So, I don’t see how a middle class could produce enough talented-but-not-career politicians. Would you mind discussing that?

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Not at all. The system is already meant to be a part time, limited position. Senate terms are 6 years. Presidential terms are 4 years. Representatives are 2 years. All local and state roles have terms. Most LIMIT the number of terms. It’s not a job you’re supposed to do forever.

      Even Congress’ schedule is based on the idea that the members of Congress are doing this part of the year and then going back home to do whatever they did before. I’m not saying people that are good at the job shouldn’t get to continue, but it’s not DESIGNED to be a full-time, life-time job.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        That’s the theory, but we see the practice being different. And I ask how you plan on fixing it. A job with a lot of requirements, very demanding, that you propose to underpay with respect to the private sector and that, after wrecking your life for a couple of years, kicks you out. Other than martyrs and corrupted people, I don’t know who would apply for it. And corruption is more widespread than martyrdom