That’s not how climate science works. The IPCC reports detail the current scientific consensus. Single papers do not change the consensus as soon as they are published.
IPCC AR6 on the contrary said things are better than we thought in AR5, and downgraded the likelyhood for the worst scenarios to play out.
You tried friend. Best to just leave this one be. Some people just want to live in their own world and refute reality even when presented overwhelmingly loads of evidence to the contrary.
You tried save your sanity trust me I’ve gone that road with others before it is not worth your time or energy till they are willing and able to hear you.
That’s not how climate science works. The IPCC reports detail the current scientific consensus. Single papers do not change the consensus as soon as they are published.
IPCC AR6 on the contrary said things are better than we thought in AR5, and downgraded the likelyhood for the worst scenarios to play out.
Have you read any IPCC reports?
Have you read the experts that point out the IPCC has continuously been overly conservative?
You tried friend. Best to just leave this one be. Some people just want to live in their own world and refute reality even when presented overwhelmingly loads of evidence to the contrary.
You tried save your sanity trust me I’ve gone that road with others before it is not worth your time or energy till they are willing and able to hear you.
Hope you have a great day :)
You really don’t understand how the scientific method works.
That makes you a climate science denier.