∃∀λ@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1244arrow-down15cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1239arrow-down1external-linkHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.org∃∀λ@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square37linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·9 months agoDo you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·9 months agoNo, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting. Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.
Do you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
No, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting.
Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.