President Donald Trump told reporters on Monday that China has to give the United States magnets or “we have to charge them 200% tariff or something” amid a trade dispute between the two nations.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250825175243/https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-says-china-has-give-us-magnets-or-face-200-tariff-2025-08-25/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 个月前

      I’m not sure isreal raises to that level - there is other pressure that is lest harmful to us that would work (i think) if we applied it.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 个月前

        Imposing terrifs on israel is a lot less harmful if not harmful at all compared to china

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 个月前

          the difference is I don’t think anything else will get china’s attention. I don’t support tarrifs except as a last resort.

          China has done plenty of their own genocide and isn’t above doing it inithe future.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 个月前

            China invest in new markets so the best way would be to compete against it in those new market and work on reducing dependences on china

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 个月前

              We have been trying for years. It has only rarely worked. Often coups and corruption destroy any good we do. (some corruption is us some not. Some attemyts have been really bad)

              i donft disagee, but I can’t agree either and I don’t think there will be a good return on investment. (Though return on investment isn’t the only goal)