- cross-posted to:
- justpost@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- justpost@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29035971
Posting here for preservationâs sake
Image in removed comment was the attached Palpatine image. Curious to see if the same admin mod would remove these screenshots if I crosspost them to !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com , which they also admin and mod. Would I get a fair trial there or will my dissenting and othersâ be silenced?
You canât say youâre against disinfo if youâre knowing and intentionally promulgating it and abetting its usage. They also didnât even remove the Reddit watermark.
This is why I donât assign identities unto myself, because you criticize one action done wrong by leaders of an ideology or movement and bam! youâre shut out of it completely. Theyâve lost the aid of an ally and progress is impeded by being shorted a participant trying to correct the course.
You can complain all you like in here, feel free.
Different communities have different purposes and different moderation guidelines. So I think this is a ridiculous take. The lefty memes comm is of course going to be seen by certain people as âpropagandaâ, but itâs not for them, itâs for leftists. If other folks also enjoy it then great, but if not, no big deal.
(So) what?? We have no rules against reposting AI generated images in that community. What AI images have I ever posted to FvD? None, zero, sfa⊠unless they were the subject of a debunking article. So it was just a bullshit troll comment afaik.
But we do have an instance rule that says âFuck around and find outâ, a community rule in Lefty Memes that says â1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced hereâ and finally " 3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries."
Also you:
Iâm not feeling a lot of allyship vibes from that tbh.
The reason you got a permaban is because the anti-ai crowd usually canât stop themselves from banging on about it. If you agree to not post bullshit troll comments in the community again then Iâll consider reducing the ban.
Youâll notice that my interactions with the community prior have been sparse; the community clearly does not live up to its self-description of âa place for undogmatic shitpostingâ, but there are some points presented in the bounded ideology that I see reason in and there are some posts/comments there that I see needing reason added to them. Your quote of mine and the following screenshot are not in disagreement with each other. My loyalty is not to an in-group. My loyalty is to reality. My alliance is with the allies of truth, and the content of the dogma is partially true so I considered the community a partial ally with whom we shared some common goals and enemies. I have no in-group, and my out-group is comprised of those who arbitrarily out-group other people and those who are obdurate for the sake of maintaining an ideological identity.
Propaganda is still propaganda even if the views and message are both factually and morally correct.
It wasnât a troll comment; it was earnestly pointing out a contradiction of values. It doesnât make sense to demean falsehoods to one crowd and turn and peddle synthetic messages to another crowd. Just because something is or is not in a rule somewhere does not make it inherently right or wrong, and I spoke out against two things that I saw to be wrong.
Conversely, the pro-AI crowd should stop disrespecting their audience by cross-contaminating the feeds of real and zealous imitation. I will call a spade a spade and I will content that is lazy, impersonal, and manipulative to be lazy, impersonal, and manipulative (lazy content can still be good if done personally plus correctly). Itâs neither respectful nor in good faith to an audience to expect them to be placated and content with a façade such as that. Iâd rather the standard for content here not be degraded to such a value.
I genuinely donât understand Rule 3âs relevance to this situation. It kind of just sounds like âIf youâre not with me 100% then youâre against me 100%â?
I donât need a reduced ban. As you may have inferred before, I didnât plan to engage much with the community in the future anyway since it is uncomfortably dogmatic. The silencing I received to dissent also drove away any chance of me wanting to integrate with that particular in-group. I more so wanted to preserve the reaction of power when truth is spoken to it.
Youâre allowed to not like stuff in a community. Youâre allowed to express that displeasure. Youâre also allowed to not enter or engage with a community thatâs not aimed at you, and let other people enjoy the things they enjoy.
The whole point of lefty memes is to post (occasionally) entertaining leftist messages in a meme format for folks who appreciate them. Under your definition they would all be considered propaganda, even though they are clearly posted in a âLefty Memesâ community and factually accurate? Iâd get your point if it was masquerading as a general memes community and we only allowed leftist content.
You made a comment inferring âpiratesâ who use genAI are monsters. If that is a good faith comment, then Iâd hate to see your bad faith comments.
Falsehoods? Synthetic messages? I saw the post, liked the message, and crossposted it to lefty memes. End of story. The rest is all happening in your head somewhere. Who or what originally created it is largely irrelevant to me because itâs a memes community, they are all copied from somewhere. I simply post or crosspost things I think the community will like and are aligned with leftist ideas.